Alpert Ward 2 Ed Council Testimony on B24-0570 and B24-0571

Testimony by David Alpert

President, Ward 2 Education Council

B24-0570, Schools First in Budgeting Amendment Act

B24-0571, Schools Full Budgeting Amendment Act

January 20, 2022

Good morning, Mr Chairman and members of the Council. My name is David Alpert, and I am

president of the Ward 2 Education Council and a parent of a DCPS third grader and future

kindergartener.

Thank you for your attention to this issue of school budgeting and for introducing these bills. The

first question before us is: whether the council should legislate the formula for determining

individual school budgets.

As a general supporter of executive discretion, in theory, I think budgets should be formed by

DCPS with input from principals and parents. But the way schools cower in fear of sudden cuts

even during flush times for this city does not work for our schools. Further, the process of rolling

out a new budget model over the last year and beyond is so egregious in its secrecy and

contempt for the council and for parents that the council must act.

I’d much prefer to work on issues collaboratively with city officials, as opposed to oppositionally.

That was my strategy for transportation and planning advocacy in the past, and I found it to be

an effective one. We want the same things - successful and equitable public education serving

the children of DC.

I have been baffled, therefore, that DCPS leaders have said they have a new budget model that

was, as one described it, “a cake that was baked” years ago, but delayed because of the

pandemic. But DCPS leaders will not tell us what the cake looks like. When I pick up my

daughter’s birthday cake, I certainly want to see if the decorator spelled her name correctly, and

not have to wait until the party begins.

Yet DCPS officials have refused to answer specific questions. They rebuffed repeated requests

from the ward education councils and other advocates to provide a direct comparison between

the current Comprehensive Staffing Model and the new model. Mr. Francois attended two ed

council meetings and yet organizers still felt in the dark. And, worst of all, DCPS outright refused

last week to provide that comparison, despite being requested in a letter signed by every single

councilmember.

I’ve participated in many hearings where residents argued they hadn’t been consulted. But in

almost all of the transportation or planning hearings I attended, officials had made good faith

efforts to be forthcoming with residents… or, perhaps, just had to move with haste and hadn’t

had time to talk to people. Here, DCPS officials seem to be insinuating that we’ll hate their new

model and so they won’t tell us what it looks like until the last minute, at which point it will be

much harder to influence it.

I’d like to love the new model. I hear it’s about equity and I support that. If DCPS simply said

they were planning to ramp up funding to schools with high at risk populations, for instance, I’d

be enthusiastic - even if my child’s school isn’t one that would see more money. I’d want to ask

to avoid cuts at other schools, but I would be glad to see us do more for our children furthest

from opportunity.

But instead, we just see a mysterious calculation which seems to suggest some schools will win

and some will lose based on enrollment, perhaps with small schools losing the most for no

articulated reason, and other unanticipated changes.

Already, principals and LSATs face the prospect of staff cuts year after year, to classroom

teachers, or aides, or inner core specials, or mental health professionals, and then often those

cuts get reversed. But it’s too late to retain good staff members who seek more stable school

jobs.

Our city has had budget surpluses for years, thankfully. Through one of these bills or a hybrid,

let’s ensure that school communities don’t have to live with a sword of Damocles constantly over

them, at least not as long as the city budget is strong.

On the specifics of the legislation, I have a few particular comments about the Schools First in

Budgeting Act.

First, I would suggest adding clarity about the definition of enrollment that would, as the act

provides, "require one or more additional classroom teachers" or "warrant elimination of a

classroom teacher.” Without specifics of what triggers those provisions, DCPS might simply be

able to trigger the provision when it wants to and never when it doesn’t, while schools would

lack the predictability this bill seeks to create.

Second, the law provides that the budget can be cut if enrollment drops so as to “eliminate a

classroom or warrant elimination of a classroom teacher.” My reading is that in such a case,

DCPS could then cut the budget by any amount it wished, including cutting other services or

programs. If this isn’t what you meant, then it could read that in such a class only classroom

teachers are cut, or limit other cuts in some way, such as proportionally. But, if left as is, then

schools which see declining enrollment would be as vulnerable as they are now, because losing

just one class worth would essentially exempt the school from all of the protections in the bill.

Finally, I recommend dropping the provision that would switch school budgets to use actual staff

costs instead of average ones. A brand new 10-month teacher with a bachelor’s made $56,313

in FY 2019 and a 21-year veteran with a Ph.D. $116,408 - more than double.1 A principal facing

budget cuts, or a new principal trying to turn around a struggling school, may well see it much

more desirable to have two adults, even inexperienced ones, over a veteran teacher. DCPS

does not have tenure or seniority preference, which affords flexibility, but the average cost

1 ET-15 FY 2019 Pay Schedule, https://dcps.dc.gov/node/1294871

accounting is therefore very valuable to ensure there’s no incentive to replace veterans with

twice as many newer teachers.

Such a switch is not necessary. School budgets will continue to flow through the city

government as they have, even if the amounts are more narrowly prescribed. A school could

simply continue to have a budget it uses for staffing and then the actual amount of money

coming from the treasury isn’t exactly identical.

I know that if any bill is passed, it will not happen in time to affect the coming year’s budgets. I

hope the council will, however, use its power in the regular budget process to ensure that

schools don’t lose staff or programs this year. If schools with the greatest learning loss can be

further given extra resources, while other schools can maintain their current staffing levels and

programs, that would be all the better.

I wish DCPS were having this dialogue and trying to craft a new budget framework that really is

predictable, equitable, and transparent, so the council did not need to. But instead, they have

chosen to rebuff parents and rebuff you as well while not apparently solving the problems we

face. And so, the council should both make clear that refusing to answer questions is

unacceptable, and further to set a better policy that actually achieves DCPS’ stated goals.

Thank you.